Why
Loiter? Radical Possibilities for gendered dissent
Shilpa
Phadke, Shilpa Ranade and Sameera Khan
At
the outset, the authors discuss how in today’s world, the urban-educated women
possess a longing to roam independently and discover their cities without any
constraints. Further, the article brings to light society’s outlook towards
these women and highlights that when an unfortunate incident happens, more often
than not, these women are held responsible rather than the actual perpetrators
of such acts.
In
a social experiment executed by the author in Mumbai, it was found that the use of
public spaces by women was thought of as something provisional and not intrinsic. Often,
poor and low caste men are believed to be the habitual predators of these women
because of the prevailing intersectionality between caste and class. The article
also notes that we assume (without further investigation) that women have less
access to public spaces than men. We live in a society where a “good woman” is
the one who hardly comes out in the public spaces and the woman who frequently
goes out is a “bad woman” who should not be considered worthy of social
protection. This is certainly not in line with ideals of equality which demands
that people should not be discriminated against on the grounds of sex or gender.
No comments:
Post a Comment