Tuesday, March 3, 2020

Milind Malhar Sharma - week 5

The following is a comment on the piece written by Aniruddha Dutta and Raina Roy titled ‘Decolonizing transgender in India: Some Reflections’
In their essay, Aniruddha Dutta and Raina Roy interrogate the transgender identity in the Indian context and argue that the idea of seeing South Asian discourses of Gender and sexual identity as merely local expressions of transgender identity misses out on the complexities represented by such discourses. The personal experiences of the authors play a central role in the arguments they make. While the authors don’t advocate the complete annihilation of the notion of ‘transgender’ as an open ended umbrella term but critique the structural constraints under which the term functions. Because under the open ended interpretation, a tradition of post-colonial discourse is bolstered which eventually works towards the detriment of these complex identities examples of which are witnessed in south Asia. According to the authors, what is primarily at fault for this kind of perpetuation is a centralized structure of social movements through activism, funding, NGOs and academics which pose hurdles in the emergence of counter-hegemonic movements which can work towards bringing a greater change in terms of recognition and how they are perceived. Thus, it becomes important to critiquw the over-arching structure which then allows a greater democratization of LGBTQIA movements outside the ‘west’.

No comments:

Post a Comment