Tuesday, March 10, 2020

Abhijeet Shrivastava, Week 6


Why Loiter? Radical Possibilities for gendered dissent 



The authors begin by challenging the narrowness of the pre-existing discourse with respect to emancipating women from patriarchal burdens, in that the focus is on protecting women against domestic violence, rape, and other crimes. This positions women as victims, narrativizing said emancipation in paternalistic terms. Rather, emancipation must be oriented around normalizing basic liberties, including loitering. Loitering, as a small act pursuing pleasure, in itself is presently a rebellious act for women. However, to orient feminism to include the pursuit of pleasure, including normalizing loitering, would dilute paternalism, and make it a movement legitimizing and empowering women’s claims to public spaces with dignity.

Based on extensive research in Mumbai, the authors explain the prevalent complexities of women’s access to public spaces, in that not only are public spaces presently hubs of masculinity, but also that there are discrepancies in access across different classes, castes, and such demographics.  First, while men have a natural claim to public spaces, women have to maintain certain demeanours and mannerisms to justify their intrusions in public spaces. Second, an instance of the latter intersectionality is as upper-class women seem to be entitled to loiter in public spaces, even more so than men of lower classes, whereas the rest of women are more vulnerable. In their work, sex-workers are the only major exception to the boundaries in loitering, but they do not reflect the status of women in general. Normalizing loitering, therefore, is a subtle, but important way to make public spaces non-patriarchal.

No comments:

Post a Comment