‘Why loiter? Radical
possibilities for gendered dissent’ written by Shilpa
Phadke, Shikpa Ranade and Sameera khan, talks about women and their right
to feel safe in public spaces and how the concept of loiter is only given to
the males of the society. The writer also points out that loiter itself is not
considered being something good as according to its definition it means
wandering on streets aimlessly but here, she demands that the right should be
given to both men and women equally. The class difference that the writer
mentions here is related to an aspect that we notice in our society as well
where women considered subaltern traveling in public transport or roaming
around streets are looked upon and are under constant surveillance and harassed
by men compared to women who are travelling in their own private cars or
loitering outside stores or in the malls. The issue that the writer brings
to light is the fact that as we notice women all over the world raise their
voices for violence against women, rape, equal rights abuse and harassment but
no one speaks about the simple aspect of day to day activities where women are
deprived of such as loitering to have a sense of belonging in the city. The concept
of loitering creates a question of binaries who is allowed to loiter and who is
not? This article sums up and negotiates issues that women from different
classes and communities encounter on a daily basis.
No comments:
Post a Comment