Egg
and the Sperm by Emily Martin
1. Emily Martin in her
reading “Egg and the Sperm” argues about how a logical subject like Science is
also corrupted by the gender biasness within the scientists. The Science
experts and doctors somewhere portray the male reproductive system as superior
to the female reproductive system. The process of menstruation, that is the
breakdown of the endometrial lining due to the lack of fertilization is seen as
failure. The egg is being explained to the students as a lazy, weak sleeping
beauty that rests within the ovaries of the female. Whereas the male gametes,
that is the sperms are seen as something which is generated in abundance, is
highly mobile and energetic. Therefore,
Martin argues that the female's reproduction system is portrayed as a failure
because during their menstrual cycle, they are expelling one gamete per month
while the male's reproduction system is producing millions of sperm each day.
This clearly implies that the female biological processes are less worthy than
that of the male. Martin further argues that we think we know a lot because of
science in this age, but the truth is, the way we interpret science is sexist
and it actually makes us ignorant . Such gender bias reinforces gender
inequality and continues to keep our traditional misogyny alive.
Night to his Day by Judith Lober
2. Judith Lorber in his reading “Night to his Day”: The
Social Construction of Gender is such a familiar part of daily life that it
usually takes a deliberate disruption of our expectations of how women and men
are supposed to act to pay attention to how it is produced. Then we are
uncomfortable until we have successfully placed the other person in a gender
status; otherwise, we feel socially dislocated. Lorber argues that “bodies
differ in many ways physiologically; but they are completely transformed by
social practices to fit into the salient categories of a society, the most
pervasive of which are ‘female’ and ‘male and ‘women’ and ‘men’". However,
Lorber connects these social barriers that continually separate the sexes in
sports, with the economic barriers oppressing the female sex. Lorber continues
to describe social boundaries set up by gender using technology; she brings up
two examples—computers and cars. When computers first came into use, office
jobs involving them were given to women, as it appeared to be a clerical duty.
It was not until computers were revealed to be complex and intellectually
demanding that they became the domain of men. Lorber points out that the
diversity of humans could be categorized, regrouped and broken up into
different ways of comparison than the traditional sex differentiation that
disregards the real issues of who is truly like whom.
No comments:
Post a Comment