Open
letter to CJI
Summary
This letter discusses the Tukaram v. State of Maharashtra (1979) case.
It briefly explains the facts of the case and the decisions of the High Court
and Supreme Court. This letter is a appeal to have the case reheard, by a
larger bench or full court. It says that the Supreme Court’s extraordinary
decision was a sacrifice of human rights of women under the law and the
constitution. And it questions the decision as there was no cogent analysis
regarding as to why the factors which weighed with the High Court was not
sufficient to justify conviction of rape. It also discusses the scope of
‘consent’ in the constitution. As
Supreme Court should have only focused on the third component of
Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which applies when rape is committed with
the woman’s consent, when “her consent has been obtained by putting her
in fear of death or hurt”. But the second component of Section 375 is when rape
occurs without her consent. There is a clear difference in law, and common
sense,
between ‘submission’ and ‘consent’.
Consent involves submission; but the converse is
not necessarily true. Nor is
absence of resistance necessarily indicative of consent. the issue before the
Court was simply whether the act was committed with her consent, under fear of
death or hurt. From the facts of the case, all that is established is
submission, and not consent. The Court has given no consideration whatsoever to
the socio-economic status, the lack of
knowledge of legal rights, the age
of the victim, lack of access to legal services, and the
fear complex which haunts the poor
and the exploited in Indian police stations. But a case like this with its
cold-blooded legalism snuffs out all aspirations for the protection of human
rights of millions of Mathura’s in the Indian countryside. But what matters is
a search for liberation from the colonial and male-dominated notions of what
may constitute the element of consent, and the burden of proof, for rape which
affect many Mathura’s on the Indian countryside.
No comments:
Post a Comment